So, we have been told that we as a nation have become intolerant!
And who has told us this?
A handful of self-styled half-intellectuals,
pseudo-yellow-journalists, artists posing as intellectuals and of course
corrupt politicians. Now-now, have I stirred a hornet’s nest here? I guess I
may have but I hold on to this view because I have full reason to say what I
said. Let me explain.
I will take one or two persons each from the above groups of
people who were either involved in germinating the thought that we as a nation
had suddenly become intolerant and then the people who kept it alive in public
discourse and finally those who helped propagating it.
One of the first murmurs of we as a nation becoming
intolerant came from a nondescript writer named Nayantara Sehgal who returned
her Sahitya Akademi award, which was conferred in 1986 by the Rajiv Gandhi-led
Congress government. Who is Nayantara Sehgal? She is Motilal Nehru’s
granddaughter, Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit’s daughter and Rajiv Gandhi’s aunt. She
returned the award that Rajiv-led government gave her in protest to rising
intolerance in the country citing killings of Govind Pansare, Narendra
Dabholkar & M.M. Kalburgi along with the Dadri lynching victim. Now, for a
moment, let us set aside the fact that she’s a Congress loyalist and look at
the reasons cited by her – the killings of one of the persons (Dabholkar)
happened during Congress regime in Maharashtra (when UPA was in power in the
center), the other (Kalburgi) happened in Karnataka (ruled by Congress) and
third (Pansare) happened in Maharashtra within a few months of BJP-led
government was formed in Maharashtra and last one (Dadri) happened in UP where
a SP government is in place. So, why is Ms. Sahgal suddenly feeling the intolerance?
Where was her intolerance in 1984 when there was Congress-led carnage of Sikhs
when more than 5,000 innocent Sikhs were murdered – then, he had happily taken
the award within two-years in 1986. She chose to remain silent then – was this
the reason Rajiv bestowed Sahitya Akademi award to her? This clearly shows her
hypocrisy. After her, many other writers followed suit – and if we were to look
at them too, we would certainly see that most of them had Congress patronage
(which is evident if 55 years of the 68 years of independent India was ruled by
Congress and many of these people got their awards and patronage from Congress
governments).
Lets now look at the pseudo-yellow-journalists – one of the
big ones among them is Barkha Datt – who also wrote an open letter to the PM
Modi recently – I wonder what makes us as a nation tolerate the likes of Datt –
we know now with clinching evidence in form of recordings of what she was doing
with Nira Raadia – Datt is not a journalist but a power broker who worked for
corporate big-wigs to fix power deals in the UPA 1 & 2 regimes and is
currently jobless and hence is back to trying her hand at journalism! Clearly,
she’ll work for the interest of Congress and therefore try and sully the image
of Modi-led BJP government using her part-time journalist job and organization
i.e. NDTV, which helped keep the topic of intolerance alive in public discourse
and sullied India’s image. There are many such pseudo-journalists and
media-houses who did exactly like what Datt and NDTV did to help the cause of
“intolerance” in this country.
Now, lets look at artists such Aamir Khan and Shahrukh Khan
– both of these are plausibly good at their job i.e. acting albeit I think otherwise,
yet I won’t take anything from them on that count. However, in acting they are
directed by the director who helps mold them into the said character they have
to depict. But are they intellectuals or do they qualify to comment on a topic such
as intolerance? I don’t think so. Again a look at their background – it is very
well known fact that Aamir is anti-Modi and the same can be traced back to his
interview with another pseudo-yellow-journalist Shekhar Gupta, when he was
trying to implicate Modi for 2002 riots in Gujarat. So, Aamir too has vested
interests to support the intolerance plank and just as in movies he is directed
by a director, here too he was perhaps being directed by a commendable director
because of which Aamir also offered his wife’s to act for free along with her
opinion to support the intolerance plank – the objective being that with
millions of fans of Aamir and Shahrukh, the plank of intolerance shall spread
far and wide and the government shall be kept busy tackling the non-issue and
not be able to work for the people and for the nation.
And finally let us look at political parties who raked up
the intolerance debate – most prominent among them being Congress who has been
championing the cause of intolerance in the country – what has been their
credentials: masters in corruption and looting of this country at an
unprecedented scale for nearly six decades. It’s been a rarity to see them out
of power and whenever they have had to sit away from the treasury benches, they
have only raised non-issues to affect the performance of new government so that
by hook or crook they can return to power and continue with their loot.
Therefore, for establishing that there is “intolerance” in this country, they orchestrated
the whole issue from germination by employing select so-called-intellectual loyalists
such as Nayantara Sahgal, followed by brokers in media such as pseudo-journalist
Barkha Datt who helped in establishing “intolerance” in public discourse and finally
for propagating the same they used the actors in Bollywood with large
fan-following such as Aamir Khan and Shahrukh Khan.
And, we as people of this country bought the story they
touted and fell for it lock-stock-and-barrel.
What a pity!